You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Risk of contrast induced nephropathy in the critically ill: a prospective, case matched study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc11317 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cynthia M Cely, Roland MH Schein, Andrew A Quartin |
Abstract |
Computerized tomography is frequently employed in the critically ill, often using intravenous radiocontrast material. Many of these patients have clinical features that are considered risk factors for contrast induced nephropathy, but are simultaneously at risk for renal injury from other factors related to their acute illnesses. The attributable risk for renal dysfunction from radiocontrast exposure has not been well quantified in this population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Australia | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
Czechia | 1 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 59 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 13 | 19% |
Researcher | 12 | 18% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Professor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 19% |
Unknown | 13 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 69% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 14 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2012.
All research outputs
#14,784,639
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,874
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,577
of 175,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#61
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.