You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical review: Respiratory monitoring in the ICU - a consensus of 16
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc11146 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laurent Brochard, Greg S Martin, Lluis Blanch, Paolo Pelosi, F Javier Belda, Amal Jubran, Luciano Gattinoni, Jordi Mancebo, V Marco Ranieri, Jean-Christophe M Richard, Diederik Gommers, Antoine Vieillard-Baron, Antonio Pesenti, Samir Jaber, Ola Stenqvist, Jean-Louis Vincent |
| Abstract |
Monitoring plays an important role in the current management of patients with acute respiratory failure but sometimes lacks definition regarding which 'signals' and 'derived variables' should be prioritized as well as specifics related to timing (continuous versus intermittent) and modality (static versus dynamic). Many new techniques of respiratory monitoring have been made available for clinical use recently, but their place is not always well defined. Appropriate use of available monitoring techniques and correct interpretation of the data provided can help improve our understanding of the disease processes involved and the effects of clinical interventions. In this consensus paper, we provide an overview of the important parameters that can and should be monitored in the critically ill patient with respiratory failure and discuss how the data provided can impact on clinical management. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Czechia | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 262 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 16% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 73 | 26% |
| Unknown | 48 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 160 | 57% |
| Engineering | 26 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Unknown | 56 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,759,857
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,390
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,973
of 175,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#13
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.