↓ Skip to main content

Is globalization healthy: a statistical indicator analysis of the impacts of globalization on health

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is globalization healthy: a statistical indicator analysis of the impacts of globalization on health
Published in
Globalization and Health, September 2010
DOI 10.1186/1744-8603-6-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pim Martens, Su-Mia Akin, Huynen Maud, Raza Mohsin

Abstract

It is clear that globalization is something more than a purely economic phenomenon manifesting itself on a global scale. Among the visible manifestations of globalization are the greater international movement of goods and services, financial capital, information and people. In addition, there are technological developments, more transboundary cultural exchanges, facilitated by the freer trade of more differentiated products as well as by tourism and immigration, changes in the political landscape and ecological consequences. In this paper, we link the Maastricht Globalization Index with health indicators to analyse if more globalized countries are doing better in terms of infant mortality rate, under-five mortality rate, and adult mortality rate. The results indicate a positive association between a high level of globalization and low mortality rates. In view of the arguments that globalization provides winners and losers, and might be seen as a disequalizing process, we should perhaps be careful in interpreting the observed positive association as simple evidence that globalization is mostly good for our health. It is our hope that a further analysis of health impacts of globalization may help in adjusting and optimising the process of globalization on every level in the direction of a sustainable and healthy development for all.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 165 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 20%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 33 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 21%
Social Sciences 35 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 4%
Other 37 21%
Unknown 36 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2012.
All research outputs
#7,849,331
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#876
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,897
of 106,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.