↓ Skip to main content

Weight gain prevention among black women in the rural community health center setting: The Shape Program

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
405 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Weight gain prevention among black women in the rural community health center setting: The Shape Program
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-305
Pubmed ID
Authors

Perry Foley, Erica Levine, Sandy Askew, Elaine Puleo, Jessica Whiteley, Bryan Batch, Daniel Heil, Daniel Dix, Veronica Lett, Michele Lanpher, Jade Miller, Karen Emmons, Gary Bennett

Abstract

Nearly 60% of black women are obese. Despite their increased risk of obesity and associated chronic diseases, black women have been underrepresented in clinical trials of weight loss interventions, particularly those conducted in the primary care setting. Further, existing obesity treatments are less effective for this population. The promotion of weight maintenance can be achieved at lower treatment intensity than can weight loss and holds promise in reducing obesity-associated chronic disease risk. Weight gain prevention may also be more consistent with the obesity-related sociocultural perspectives of black women than are traditional weight loss approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 405 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 396 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 13%
Researcher 49 12%
Student > Bachelor 48 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 7%
Other 55 14%
Unknown 111 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 21%
Psychology 56 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 11%
Social Sciences 41 10%
Sports and Recreations 14 3%
Other 38 9%
Unknown 127 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2013.
All research outputs
#2,355,267
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,708
of 14,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,794
of 166,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#29
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.