↓ Skip to main content

Racial differences in the built environment—body mass index relationship? A geospatial analysis of adolescents in urban neighborhoods

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Geographics, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Racial differences in the built environment—body mass index relationship? A geospatial analysis of adolescents in urban neighborhoods
Published in
International Journal of Health Geographics, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1476-072x-11-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dustin T Duncan, Marcia C Castro, Steven L Gortmaker, Jared Aldstadt, Steven J Melly, Gary G Bennett

Abstract

Built environment features of neighborhoods may be related to obesity among adolescents and potentially related to obesity-related health disparities. The purpose of this study was to investigate spatial relationships between various built environment features and body mass index (BMI) z-score among adolescents, and to investigate if race/ethnicity modifies these relationships. A secondary objective was to evaluate the sensitivity of findings to the spatial scale of analysis (i.e. 400- and 800-meter street network buffers).

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 196 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 19%
Researcher 32 16%
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 5%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 45 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 40 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Computer Science 7 3%
Other 43 21%
Unknown 58 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2022.
All research outputs
#6,583,045
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#209
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,003
of 176,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.