You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Characteristics of national registries for occupational diseases: international development and validation of an audit tool (ODIT)
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, October 2009
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-9-194 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dick Spreeuwers, Angela GEM de Boer, Jos HAM Verbeek, Frank JH van Dijk |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 31 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 29% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 15% |
Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Professor | 3 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 15% |
Unknown | 4 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 15% |
Unknown | 5 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,551,787
of 25,413,176 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,278
of 8,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,303
of 107,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,413,176 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.