You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Limitations of drug registries to evaluate orphan medicinal products for the treatment of lysosomal storage disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1750-1172-6-16 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carla EM Hollak, Johannes MFG Aerts, Ségolène Aymé, Jeremy Manuel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 21% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#768
of 3,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,582
of 109,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.