You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ultrasound-based clinical profiles for predicting the risk of intradialytic hypotension in critically ill patients on intermittent dialysis: a prospective observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2668-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rogerio da Hora Passos, Juliana Caldas, Joao Gabriel Rosa Ramos, Erica Batista dos Santos Galvão de Melo, Michel Por Deus Ribeiro, Maria Fernanda Coelho Alves, Paulo Benigno Pena Batista, Octavio Henrique Coelho Messeder, Augusto Manoel de Carvalho de Farias, Etienne Macedo, Jean Jacques Rouby |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 3 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 9% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 4% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
| Scientists | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 19% |
| Researcher | 6 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 23% |
| Unknown | 8 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 58% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,963,625
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,479
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,452
of 473,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#45
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.