↓ Skip to main content

The anaemia of Plasmodium vivax malaria

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The anaemia of Plasmodium vivax malaria
Published in
Malaria Journal, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-11-135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas M Douglas, Nicholas M Anstey, Pierre A Buffet, Jeanne R Poespoprodjo, Tsin W Yeo, Nicholas J White, Ric N Price

Abstract

Plasmodium vivax threatens nearly half the world's population and is a significant impediment to achievement of the millennium development goals. It is an important, but incompletely understood, cause of anaemia. This review synthesizes current evidence on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment and consequences of vivax-associated anaemia. Young children are at high risk of clinically significant and potentially severe vivax-associated anaemia, particularly in countries where transmission is intense and relapses are frequent. Despite reaching lower densities than Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax causes similar absolute reduction in red blood cell mass because it results in proportionately greater removal of uninfected red blood cells. Severe vivax anaemia is associated with substantial indirect mortality and morbidity through impaired resilience to co-morbidities, obstetric complications and requirement for blood transfusion. Anaemia can be averted by early and effective anti-malarial treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 283 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 16%
Researcher 42 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 14%
Student > Bachelor 33 11%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Other 49 17%
Unknown 61 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 4%
Other 45 15%
Unknown 66 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,610,699
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#811
of 5,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,741
of 176,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#6
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.