↓ Skip to main content

The interferon type I signature towards prediction of non-response to rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
3 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The interferon type I signature towards prediction of non-response to rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis patients
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/ar3819
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hennie G Raterman, Saskia Vosslamber, Sander de Ridder, Michael T Nurmohamed, Willem F Lems, Maarten Boers, Mark van de Wiel, Ben AC Dijkmans, Cornelis L Verweij, Alexandre E Voskuyl

Abstract

B cell depletion therapy is efficacious in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients failing on tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocking agents. However, approximately 40% to 50% of rituximab (RTX) treated RA patients have a poor response. We investigated whether baseline gene expression levels can discriminate between clinical non-responders and responders to RTX.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 117 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Other 12 10%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 31%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 32 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,369,647
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#967
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,050
of 175,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#5
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.