You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of routine open nonsuction drainage on fluid accumulation after thyroid surgery: a prospective randomised clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7819-10-72 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter M Neary, Owen J O’Connor, Azher Shafiq, Edel M Quinn, Justin J Kelly, Buckley Juliette, Ronan A Cahill, Josephine Barry, Henry P Redmond |
| Abstract |
Thyroid drains following thyroid surgery are routinely used despite minimal supportive evidence. Our aim in this study is to determine the impact of routine open drainage of the thyroid bed postoperatively on ultrasound-determined fluid accumulation at 24 hours. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Colombia | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2012.
All research outputs
#13,864,570
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#411
of 2,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,932
of 163,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#7
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,038 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.