You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The impact of social networks on knowledge transfer in long-term care facilities: Protocol for a study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, June 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-5-49 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anne E Sales, Carole A Estabrooks, Thomas W Valente |
Abstract |
Social networks are theorized as significant influences in the innovation adoption and behavior change processes. Our understanding of how social networks operate within healthcare settings is limited. As a result, our ability to design optimal interventions that employ social networks as a method of fostering planned behavior change is also limited. Through this proposed project, we expect to contribute new knowledge about factors influencing uptake of knowledge translation interventions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 5 | 3% |
United States | 4 | 2% |
Brazil | 3 | 2% |
Australia | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 145 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 21% |
Researcher | 30 | 18% |
Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
Professor | 12 | 7% |
Other | 36 | 22% |
Unknown | 21 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 37 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 18% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 15 | 9% |
Computer Science | 14 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
Other | 31 | 19% |
Unknown | 27 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,104,259
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,187
of 1,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,515
of 93,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.