↓ Skip to main content

The impact of social networks on knowledge transfer in long-term care facilities: Protocol for a study

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of social networks on knowledge transfer in long-term care facilities: Protocol for a study
Published in
Implementation Science, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-5-49
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne E Sales, Carole A Estabrooks, Thomas W Valente

Abstract

Social networks are theorized as significant influences in the innovation adoption and behavior change processes. Our understanding of how social networks operate within healthcare settings is limited. As a result, our ability to design optimal interventions that employ social networks as a method of fostering planned behavior change is also limited. Through this proposed project, we expect to contribute new knowledge about factors influencing uptake of knowledge translation interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 5 3%
United States 4 2%
Brazil 3 2%
Australia 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 145 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 21%
Researcher 30 18%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Professor 12 7%
Other 36 22%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 37 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 9%
Computer Science 14 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 27 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,104,259
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,187
of 1,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,515
of 93,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.