You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research cancer prevention recommendations and risk of in situ breast cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-019-1444-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nena Karavasiloglou, Anika Hüsing, Giovanna Masala, Carla H. van Gils, Renée Turzanski Fortner, Jenny Chang-Claude, Inge Huybrechts, Elisabete Weiderpass, Marc Gunter, Patrick Arveux, Agnès Fournier, Marina Kvaskoff, Anne Tjønneland, Cecilie Kyrø, Christina C. Dahm, Helene Tilma Vistisen, Marije F. Bakker, Maria-Jose Sánchez, María Dolores Chirlaque López, Carmen Santiuste, Eva Ardanaz, Virginia Menéndez, Antonio Agudo, Antonia Trichopoulou, Anna Karakatsani, Carlo La Vecchia, Eleni Peppa, Domenico Palli, Claudia Agnoli, Salvatore Panico, Rosario Tumino, Carlotta Sacerdote, Salma Tunå Butt, Signe Borgquist, Guri Skeie, Matthias Schulze, Timothy Key, Kay-Tee Khaw, Kostantinos K. Tsilidis, Merete Ellingjord-Dale, Elio Riboli, Rudolf Kaaks, Laure Dossus, Sabine Rohrmann, Tilman Kühn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 17% |
| France | 3 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 7% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 21% |
| Scientists | 5 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 49 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 52 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,823,743
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,268
of 3,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,130
of 466,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#24
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 466,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.