↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Biologically Active Compounds from Calendula officinalis Flowers using Spectrophotometry

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Chemistry, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of Biologically Active Compounds from Calendula officinalis Flowers using Spectrophotometry
Published in
BMC Chemistry, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1752-153x-6-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monica Butnariu, Cristina Zepa Coradini

Abstract

This study aimed to quantify the active biological compounds in C. officinalis flowers. Based on the active principles and biological properties of marigolds flowers reported in the literature, we sought to obtain and characterize the molecular composition of extracts prepared using different solvents. The antioxidant capacities of extracts were assessed by using spectrophotometry to measure both absorbance of the colorimetric free radical scavenger 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) as well as the total antioxidant potential, using the ferric reducing power (FRAP) assay.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Algeria 1 <1%
Unknown 175 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 21%
Student > Master 31 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Researcher 11 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 48 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 10%
Chemistry 18 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 9%
Engineering 9 5%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 51 28%