You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Title |
Evaluation of Biologically Active Compounds from Calendula officinalis Flowers using Spectrophotometry
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Chemistry, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1752-153x-6-35 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Monica Butnariu, Cristina Zepa Coradini |
Abstract |
This study aimed to quantify the active biological compounds in C. officinalis flowers. Based on the active principles and biological properties of marigolds flowers reported in the literature, we sought to obtain and characterize the molecular composition of extracts prepared using different solvents. The antioxidant capacities of extracts were assessed by using spectrophotometry to measure both absorbance of the colorimetric free radical scavenger 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) as well as the total antioxidant potential, using the ferric reducing power (FRAP) assay. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 2 | 1% |
Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Romania | 1 | <1% |
Algeria | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 175 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 38 | 21% |
Student > Master | 31 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
Researcher | 11 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
Other | 26 | 14% |
Unknown | 48 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 10% |
Chemistry | 18 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 17 | 9% |
Engineering | 9 | 5% |
Other | 25 | 14% |
Unknown | 51 | 28% |