You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Non-physician providers of obstetric care in Mexico: Perspectives of physicians, obstetric nurses and professional midwives
|
---|---|
Published in |
Human Resources for Health, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1478-4491-10-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lisa M DeMaria, Lourdes Campero, Marianne Vidler, Dilys Walker |
Abstract |
In Mexico 87% of births are attended by physicians. However, the decline in the national maternal mortality rate has been slower than expected. The Mexican Ministry of Health's 2009 strategy to reduce maternal mortality gives a role to two non-physician models that meet criteria for skilled attendants: obstetric nurses and professional midwives. This study compares and contrasts these two provider types with the medical model, analyzing perspectives on their respective training, scope of practice, and also their perception and/or experiences with integration into the public system as skilled birth attendants. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 83% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 91 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 23 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 22% |
Researcher | 13 | 13% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
Other | 21 | 22% |
Unknown | 8 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 12% |
Unknown | 15 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2012.
All research outputs
#8,185,440
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#822
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,604
of 175,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.