↓ Skip to main content

A status report on RNAi therapeutics

Overview of attention for article published in Silence, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
8 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
273 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A status report on RNAi therapeutics
Published in
Silence, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1758-907x-1-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akshay K Vaishnaw, Jared Gollob, Christina Gamba-Vitalo, Renta Hutabarat, Dinah Sah, Rachel Meyers, Tony de Fougerolles, John Maraganore

Abstract

Fire and Mello initiated the current explosion of interest in RNA interference (RNAi) biology with their seminal work in Caenorhabditis elegans. These observations were closely followed by the demonstration of RNAi in Drosophila melanogaster. However, the full potential of these new discoveries only became clear when Tuschl and colleagues showed that 21-22 bp RNA duplexes with 3" overhangs, termed small interfering (si)RNAs, could reliably execute RNAi in a range of mammalian cells. Soon afterwards, it became clear that many different human cell types had endogenous machinery, the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), which could be harnessed to silence any gene in the genome. Beyond the availability of a novel way to dissect biology, an important target validation tool was now available. More importantly, two key properties of the RNAi pathway - sequence-mediated specificity and potency - suggested that RNAi might be the most important pharmacological advance since the advent of protein therapeutics. The implications were profound. One could now envisage selecting disease-associated targets at will and expect to suppress proteins that had remained intractable to inhibition by conventional methods, such as small molecules. This review attempts to summarize the current understanding on siRNA lead discovery, the delivery of RNAi therapeutics, typical in vivo pharmacological profiles, preclinical safety evaluation and an overview of the 14 programs that have already entered clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
Germany 5 2%
Malaysia 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 243 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 23%
Researcher 52 19%
Student > Master 52 19%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Other 18 7%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 24 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 128 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 10%
Chemistry 24 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 5%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 26 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,621,892
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Silence
#8
of 28 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,104
of 104,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Silence
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one scored the same or higher as 20 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them