You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genomic prediction based on selected variants from imputed whole-genome sequence data in Australian sheep populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetics Selection Evolution, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12711-019-0514-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nasir Moghaddar, Majid Khansefid, Julius H. J. van der Werf, Sunduimijid Bolormaa, Naomi Duijvesteijn, Samuel A. Clark, Andrew A. Swan, Hans D. Daetwyler, Iona M. MacLeod |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 43% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2019.
All research outputs
#14,608,799
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Genetics Selection Evolution
#403
of 821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,090
of 473,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics Selection Evolution
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 821 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.