↓ Skip to main content

Social network analysis and agent-based modeling in social epidemiology

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
477 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social network analysis and agent-based modeling in social epidemiology
Published in
Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1742-5573-9-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abdulrahman M El-Sayed, Peter Scarborough, Lars Seemann, Sandro Galea

Abstract

The past five years have seen a growth in the interest in systems approaches in epidemiologic research. These approaches may be particularly appropriate for social epidemiology. Social network analysis and agent-based models (ABMs) are two approaches that have been used in the epidemiologic literature. Social network analysis involves the characterization of social networks to yield inference about how network structures may influence risk exposures among those in the network. ABMs can promote population-level inference from explicitly programmed, micro-level rules in simulated populations over time and space. In this paper, we discuss the implementation of these models in social epidemiologic research, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Network analysis may be ideal for understanding social contagion, as well as the influences of social interaction on population health. However, network analysis requires network data, which may sacrifice generalizability, and causal inference from current network analytic methods is limited. ABMs are uniquely suited for the assessment of health determinants at multiple levels of influence that may couple with social interaction to produce population health. ABMs allow for the exploration of feedback and reciprocity between exposures and outcomes in the etiology of complex diseases. They may also provide the opportunity for counterfactual simulation. However, appropriate implementation of ABMs requires a balance between mechanistic rigor and model parsimony, and the precision of output from complex models is limited. Social network and agent-based approaches are promising in social epidemiology, but continued development of each approach is needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 477 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
United Kingdom 8 2%
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Tunisia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 444 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 110 23%
Student > Master 80 17%
Researcher 76 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 28 6%
Other 70 15%
Unknown 76 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 82 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 70 15%
Computer Science 29 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 6%
Engineering 25 5%
Other 129 27%
Unknown 114 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,366,832
of 24,953,268 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations
#6
of 35 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,210
of 258,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,953,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one scored the same or higher as 29 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them