↓ Skip to main content

The association between malnutrition and the incidence of malaria among young HIV-infected and -uninfected Ugandan children: a prospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The association between malnutrition and the incidence of malaria among young HIV-infected and -uninfected Ugandan children: a prospective study
Published in
Malaria Journal, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-11-90
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emmanuel Arinaitwe, Anne Gasasira, Wendy Verret, Jaco Homsy, Humphrey Wanzira, Abel Kakuru, Taylor G Sandison, Sera Young, Jordan W Tappero, Moses R Kamya, Grant Dorsey

Abstract

In sub-Saharan Africa, malnutrition and malaria remain major causes of morbidity and mortality in young children. There are conflicting data as to whether malnutrition is associated with an increased or decreased risk of malaria. In addition, data are limited on the potential interaction between HIV infection and the association between malnutrition and the risk of malaria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 194 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 20%
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 43 21%
Unknown 29 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 11%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 34 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2018.
All research outputs
#5,567,582
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,421
of 5,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,463
of 160,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#15
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.