You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biotemplating rod-like viruses for the synthesis of copper nanorods and nanowires
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-3155-10-18 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jing C Zhou, Carissa M Soto, Mu-San Chen, Michael A Bruckman, Martin H Moore, Edward Barry, Banahalli R Ratna, Pehr E Pehrsson, Bradley R Spies, Tammie S Confer |
| Abstract |
In the past decade spherical and rod-like viruses have been used for the design and synthesis of new kind of nanomaterials with unique chemical positioning, shape, and dimensions in the nanosize regime. Wild type and genetic engineered viruses have served as excellent templates and scaffolds for the synthesis of hybrid materials with unique properties imparted by the incorporation of biological and organic moieties and inorganic nanoparticles. Although great advances have been accomplished, still there is a broad interest in developing reaction conditions suitable for biological templates while not limiting the material property of the product. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 38% |
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 20 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Engineering | 8 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 21% |
| Unknown | 23 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,773
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#882
of 1,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,220
of 163,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.