↓ Skip to main content

Near-present and future distribution of Anopheles albimanus in Mesoamerica and the Caribbean Basin modeled with climate and topographic data

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Geographics, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Near-present and future distribution of Anopheles albimanus in Mesoamerica and the Caribbean Basin modeled with climate and topographic data
Published in
International Journal of Health Geographics, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1476-072x-11-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas O Fuller, Martha L Ahumada, Martha L Quiñones, Sócrates Herrera, John C Beier

Abstract

Anopheles albimanus is among the most important vectors of human malaria in Mesoamerica and the Caribbean Basin (M-C). Here, we use topographic data and 1950-2000 climate (near present), and future climate (2080) layers obtained from general circulation models (GCMs) to project the probability of the species' presence, p(s), using the species distribution model MaxEnt.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 95 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Master 18 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Professor 6 6%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 35%
Environmental Science 14 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 24 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2012.
All research outputs
#14,913,296
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#374
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,847
of 175,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.