↓ Skip to main content

Research into practice: Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) for Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire, Lincolnshire (NDL)

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Research into practice: Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) for Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire, Lincolnshire (NDL)
Published in
Implementation Science, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-7-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Rowley, Richard Morriss, Graeme Currie, Justine Schneider

Abstract

To address the problem of translation from research-based evidence to routine healthcare practice, the Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire, and Lincolnshire (CLAHRC-NDL) was funded by the National Institute for Health Research as one of nine CLAHRCs across England. This paper outlines the underlying theory and its application that CLAHRC-NDL has adopted, as a case example that might be generalised to practice outside the CLAHRC, in comparison to alternative models of implementation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 154 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 18%
Other 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 10%
Student > Master 16 10%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 16 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 25%
Social Sciences 30 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 13%
Psychology 18 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 9%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 22 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2018.
All research outputs
#1,938,812
of 14,943,580 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#559
of 1,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,511
of 125,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,943,580 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.