↓ Skip to main content

Comparison on the status of vitamin A in 6- to 13- year-old children between 2002 and 2012 in China

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison on the status of vitamin A in 6- to 13- year-old children between 2002 and 2012 in China
Published in
Nutrition Journal, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12937-016-0170-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chun Yang, Jing Chen, Ning Guo, Zhen Liu, Chunfeng Yun, Yajie Li, Jianhua Piao, Xiaoguang Yang

Abstract

Vitamin A deficiency is recognized as a major public-health nutrition issue in the developing countries. Limited hospital sources and sample sizes are available in most of the existing studies associated with healthy school-age children. The aim of this study was to compare vitamin A status of 6- to 13-year-old healthy children in China between 2002 and 2012. According to China National Nutrition and Health Survey 2002 (CHNNS2002) and CHNNS2010-2013, we choose 6- to 13-year-old children as the research object. We measure the serum retinol concentrations of the children using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The children were divided into two groups: 6- to 9-year-old and 10- to 13-year-old. The areas were divided into urban and rural area. Total number of the children (6- to 13-year old) was 8170 in 2002 survey, and it was 6016 in 2012 survey. In 2012, the vitamin A level of the children was higher than that in 2002 (t = 39.26, p = 0.000). The level of vitamin A in 10- to 13-year-old group was higher than that in 6- to 9-year-old group across areas and genders between 2002 and 2012. There was no difference on the incidence of vitamin A deficiency in all the children between 2002 and 2012, but in 2012 the incidence of vitamin A deficiency in the urban children was higher than that in 2002 (x (2) = 45.456,p = 0.000). The incidence of vitamin A deficiency in 10- to 13-year-old group was lower than that in 10- to 13-year-old group across areas and genders between 2002 and 2012. In 2012, the incidence of marginal vitamin A deficiency in the children was lower than that in 2002 (x (2) = 861.604, p = 0.000). Similar phenomena were also found in across area groups. The incidence of marginal vitamin A deficiency in 10- to 13-year-old group was lower than that in 6- to 9-year-old group across areas and genders between 2002 and 2012. There was no difference in vitamin A status of the children across the area, gender and age groups between 2002 and 2012. Vitamin A nutritional status of the children in 2012 has been significantly improved compared with that in 2002. However, vitamin A deficiency was still a moderate public health problem in Chinese children, especially in younger school-age children. Consequently, controlling the incidence of vitamin a deficiency is imperative for promoting Chinese children's health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 2 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 20 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 20 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2016.
All research outputs
#17,800,994
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,234
of 1,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,884
of 298,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#26
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.