↓ Skip to main content

A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): performance, procurement and policy

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): performance, procurement and policy
Published in
Malaria Journal, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12936-019-3028-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Cunningham, Sophie Jones, Michelle L. Gatton, John W. Barnwell, Qin Cheng, Peter L. Chiodini, Jeffrey Glenn, Sandra Incardona, Cara Kosack, Jennifer Luchavez, Didier Menard, Sina Nhem, Wellington Oyibo, Roxanne R. Rees-Channer, Iveth Gonzalez, David Bell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 288 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 11%
Student > Bachelor 30 10%
Researcher 24 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 26 9%
Unknown 122 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 5%
Engineering 13 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 139 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2019.
All research outputs
#16,401,445
of 24,931,592 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,335
of 5,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,811
of 471,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#80
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,931,592 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.