↓ Skip to main content

Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE): protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE): protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3838-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aisha Shafayat, Emese Csipke, Lucy Bradshaw, Georgina Charlesworth, Florence Day, Phuong Leung, Esme Moniz-Cook, Alan A. Montgomery, Steve Morris, Gail Mountain, Reuben Ogollah, Kirsty Sprange, Lauren Yates, Martin Orrell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 18 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Psychology 6 12%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 18 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2020.
All research outputs
#12,436,599
of 18,913,389 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#3,389
of 4,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,182
of 410,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#415
of 606 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,913,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 606 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.