You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ERP correlates of social conformity in a line judgment task
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-13-43 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jing Chen, Yin Wu, Guangyu Tong, Xiaoming Guan, Xiaolin Zhou |
| Abstract |
Previous research showed that individuals have a natural tendency to conform to others. This study investigated the temporal characteristics of neural processing involved in social conformity by recording participants' brain potentials in performing a line judgment task. After making his initial choice, a participant was presented with the choices of four same-sex group members, which could be congruent or highly or moderately incongruent with the participant's own choice. The participant was then immediately given a second opportunity to respond to the same stimulus. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 127 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 62 | 48% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 13% |
| Engineering | 7 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2013.
All research outputs
#7,104,259
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#347
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,604
of 163,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.