↓ Skip to main content

Genomic selection using regularized linear regression models: ridge regression, lasso, elastic net and their extensions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Proceedings, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 376)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
283 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genomic selection using regularized linear regression models: ridge regression, lasso, elastic net and their extensions
Published in
BMC Proceedings, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1753-6561-6-s2-s10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph O Ogutu, Torben Schulz-Streeck, Hans-Peter Piepho

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 290 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 24%
Researcher 62 21%
Student > Master 48 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Other 26 9%
Unknown 56 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 100 33%
Engineering 25 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 8%
Computer Science 21 7%
Mathematics 17 6%
Other 45 15%
Unknown 70 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,260,912
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Proceedings
#44
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,840
of 164,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Proceedings
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.