You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Feasibility and acceptability of living systematic reviews: results from a mixed-methods evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1248-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tanya Millard, Anneliese Synnot, Julian Elliott, Sally Green, Steve McDonald, Tari Turner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 20% |
| United States | 5 | 17% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 47% |
| Scientists | 10 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Librarian | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,683,943
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#260
of 2,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,543
of 480,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#15
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.