Title |
Expressive writing for high-risk drug dependent patients in a primary care clinic: A pilot study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Harm Reduction Journal, November 2006
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-7517-3-34 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Karen A Baikie, Kay Wilhelm, Beverley Johnson, Mary Boskovic, Lucinda Wedgwood, Adam Finch, Gail Huon |
Abstract |
Previous research has shown that expressive writing is beneficial in terms of both physical and emotional health outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and acceptability of a brief expressive writing intervention for high-risk drug dependent patients in a primary care clinic, and to determine the relationship between linguistic features of writing and health outcomes. Participants completed four 15-minute expressive writing tasks over a week, in which they described their thoughts and feelings about a recent stressful event. Self-report measures of physical (SF-12) and psychological health (DASS-21) were administered at baseline and at a two-week follow-up. Fifty-three participants were recruited and 14 (26%) completed all measures. No statistically significant benefits in physical or psychological health were found, although all outcomes changed in the direction of improvement. The intervention was well-received and was rated as beneficial by participants. The use of more positive emotion words in writing was associated with improvements in depression and stress, and flexibility in first person pronoun use was associated with improvements in anxiety. Increasing use of cognitive process words was associated with worsening depressive mood. Although no significant benefits in physical and psychological health were found, improvements in psychological wellbeing were associated with certain writing styles and expressive writing was deemed acceptable by high-risk drug dependent patients. Given the difficulties in implementing psychosocial interventions in this population, further research using a larger sample is warranted. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 49 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 7 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
Researcher | 6 | 12% |
Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
Other | 19 | 37% |
Unknown | 3 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 23 | 44% |
Unspecified | 7 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 12% |