↓ Skip to main content

Adapting evidence-informed complex population health interventions for new contexts: a systematic review of guidance

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
79 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adapting evidence-informed complex population health interventions for new contexts: a systematic review of guidance
Published in
Implementation Science, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13012-019-0956-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Movsisyan, L. Arnold, R. Evans, B. Hallingberg, G. Moore, A. O’Cathain, L. M. Pfadenhauer, J. Segrott, E. Rehfuess

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 178 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 16%
Student > Master 25 14%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 55 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 35 20%
Psychology 20 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 10%
Social Sciences 14 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 67 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#750,697
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#93
of 1,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,390
of 429,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.