↓ Skip to main content

Adapting evidence-informed complex population health interventions for new contexts: a systematic review of guidance

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
74 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adapting evidence-informed complex population health interventions for new contexts: a systematic review of guidance
Published in
Implementation Science, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13012-019-0956-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Movsisyan, L. Arnold, R. Evans, B. Hallingberg, G. Moore, A. O’Cathain, L. M. Pfadenhauer, J. Segrott, E. Rehfuess

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 226 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 14%
Researcher 29 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 81 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 39 17%
Psychology 23 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 10%
Social Sciences 17 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 96 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#976,540
of 26,571,961 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#109
of 1,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,431
of 472,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,571,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.