You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effectiveness of guideline implementation strategies in the dental setting: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-019-0954-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy R. Villarosa, Della Maneze, Lucie M. Ramjan, Ravi Srinivas, Michelle Camilleri, Ajesh George |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 27% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 9% |
| Latvia | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Colombia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 34 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2019.
All research outputs
#5,256,769
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#923
of 1,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,808
of 465,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#19
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 465,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.