↓ Skip to main content

Editorial (For Volume 5 # 1)

Overview of attention for article published in Evolution: Education and Outreach, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial (For Volume 5 # 1)
Published in
Evolution: Education and Outreach, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12052-012-0409-y
Authors

Niles Eldredge

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 67%
Arts and Humanities 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,773
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Evolution: Education and Outreach
#665
of 729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,896
of 160,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolution: Education and Outreach
#17
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.