↓ Skip to main content

Cluster-randomised trial evaluating a complex intervention to improve mental health and well-being of employees working in hospital – a protocol for the SEEGEN trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cluster-randomised trial evaluating a complex intervention to improve mental health and well-being of employees working in hospital – a protocol for the SEEGEN trial
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-7909-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadine Mulfinger, Anja Sander, Felicitas Stuber, Regina Brinster, Florian Junne, Ronald Limprecht, Marc N. Jarczok, Tanja Seifried-Dübon, Monika A. Rieger, Stephan Zipfel, Martin Peters, Maja Stiawa, Imad Maatouk, Madeleine Helaß, Christoph Nikendei, Eva Rothermund, Nicole Hander, Ute Ziegenhain, Manuela Gulde, Melanie Genrich, Britta Worringer, Janna Küllenberg, Karl Blum, Stefan Süß, Elena Gesang, Sascha Ruhle, Andreas Müller, Jochen Schweitzer-Rothers, Peter Angerer, Harald Gündel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 180 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 73 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 13%
Psychology 23 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 74 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2021.
All research outputs
#6,405,928
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,722
of 15,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,577
of 430,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#166
of 333 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 333 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.