↓ Skip to main content

Cervical cancer screening and adherence to follow-up among Hispanic women study protocol: a randomized controlled trial to increase the uptake of cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cervical cancer screening and adherence to follow-up among Hispanic women study protocol: a randomized controlled trial to increase the uptake of cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women
Published in
BMC Cancer, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-12-170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Duggan, Gloria Coronado, Javiera Martinez, Theresa L Byrd, Elizabeth Carosso, Cathy Lopez, Maria Benavides, Beti Thompson

Abstract

In the US, Hispanic women have a higher incidence of, and mortality from, cervical cancer than non-Hispanic white women. The reason for this disparity may be attributable to both low rates of screening and poor adherence to recommended diagnostic follow-up after an abnormal Pap test. The 'Cervical Cancer Screening and Adherence to Follow-up Among Hispanic Women' study is a collaboration between a research institution and community partners made up of members from community based organizations, the Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic and the Breast, Cervical, and Colon Health Program of the Yakima District . The study will assess the efficacy of two culturally-appropriate, tailored educational programs designed to increase cervical cancer screening among Hispanic women, based in the Yakima Valley, Washington, US.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 187 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 19%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Student > Postgraduate 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 39 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 16%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Psychology 8 4%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 44 24%