You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nighttime is associated with decreased survival and resuscitation efforts for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a prospective observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-016-1323-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yosuke Matsumura, Taka-aki Nakada, Koichiro Shinozaki, Takashi Tagami, Tomohisa Nomura, Yoshio Tahara, Atsushi Sakurai, Naohiro Yonemoto, Ken Nagao, Arino Yaguchi, Naoto Morimura, SOS-KANTO 2012 study group |
| Abstract |
Whether temporal differences alter the clinical outcomes of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains inconclusive. Furthermore, the relationship between time of day and resuscitation efforts is unknown. We studied adult OHCA patients in the Survey of Survivors after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the Kanto Region (SOS-KANTO) 2012 study from January 2012 to March 2013 in Japan. The primary variable was 1-month survival. The secondary outcome variables were prehospital and in-hospital resuscitation efforts by bystanders, emergency medical services personnel, and in-hospital healthcare providers. Daytime was defined as 0701 to 1500 h, evening was defined as 1501 to 2300 h, and night was defined as 2301 to 0700 h. During the study period, 13,780 patients were included in the analysis. The patients with night OHCA had significantly lower 1-month survival compared to the patients with daytime OHCA (night vs. daytime, adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.66; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.34-2.07; P < 0.0001). The nighttime OHCA patients had significantly shorter call-response intervals, bystander CPR, in-hospital intubation, and in-hospital blood gas analyses compared to the daytime and evening OHCA patients (call-response interval: OR 0.95 and 95 % CI 0.93-0.96; bystander CPR: OR 0.85 and 95 % CI 0.78-0.93; in-hospital intubation: OR 0.85 and 95 % CI 0.74-0.97; and in-hospital blood gas analysis: OR 0.86 and 95 % CI 0.75-0.98). There was a significant temporal difference in 1-month survival after OHCA. The nighttime OHCA patients had significantly decreased resuscitation efforts by bystanders and in-hospital healthcare providers compared to those with evening and daytime OHCA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 11 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Qatar | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
| Scientists | 3 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 16% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 24% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2016.
All research outputs
#1,378,538
of 25,601,426 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,185
of 6,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,251
of 319,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#39
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,601,426 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.