↓ Skip to main content

Insulin Signaling and the Regulation of Glucose Transport

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Medicine, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 1,197)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
376 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
568 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Insulin Signaling and the Regulation of Glucose Transport
Published in
Molecular Medicine, October 2005
DOI 10.2119/2005-00029.saltiel
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise Chang, Shian-Huey Chiang, Alan R Saltiel

Abstract

Gaps remain in our understanding of the precise molecular mechanisms by which insulin regulates glucose uptake in fat and muscle cells. Recent evidence suggests that insulin action involves multiple pathways, each compartmentalized in discrete domains. Upon activation, the receptor catalyzes the tyrosine phosphorylation of a number of substrates. One family of these, the insulin receptor substrate (IRS) proteins, initiates activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway, resulting in stimulation of protein kinases such as Akt and atypical protein kinase C. The receptor also phosphorylates the adapter protein APS, resulting in the activation of the G protein TC10, which resides in lipid rafts. TC10 can influence a number of cellular processes, including changes in the actin cytoskeleton, recruitment of effectors such as the adapter protein CIP4, and assembly of the exocyst complex. These pathways converge to control the recycling of the facilitative glucose transporter Glut4.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 568 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 1%
United States 4 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 546 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 111 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 98 17%
Student > Master 74 13%
Researcher 68 12%
Student > Postgraduate 31 5%
Other 82 14%
Unknown 104 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 182 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 115 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 57 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 3%
Chemistry 16 3%
Other 67 12%
Unknown 115 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#773,454
of 25,378,284 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Medicine
#24
of 1,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#994
of 76,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Medicine
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.