↓ Skip to main content

Driving pressure is not associated with mortality in mechanically ventilated patients without ARDS

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
56 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Driving pressure is not associated with mortality in mechanically ventilated patients without ARDS
Published in
Critical Care, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13054-019-2698-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J. Lanspa, Ithan D. Peltan, Jason R. Jacobs, Jeffrey S. Sorensen, Lori Carpenter, Jeffrey P. Ferraro, Samuel M. Brown, Jay G. Berry, Raj Srivastava, Colin K. Grissom

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 14 15%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Psychology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 21 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,197,426
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,001
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,971
of 474,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#24
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.