You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A case of misalignment: the perspectives of local and national decision-makers on the implementation of psychological treatment by telephone in the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Service
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-019-4824-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelly Rushton, Claire Fraser, Judith Gellatly, Helen Brooks, Peter Bower, Christopher J. Armitage, Cintia Faija, Charlotte Welsh, Penny Bee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 67% |
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 31 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 26 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,839,419
of 23,184,056 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,296
of 7,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,397
of 457,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#93
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,184,056 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.