You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Health insurance coverage, type of payment for health insurance, and reasons for not being insured under the National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Economics Review, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13561-019-0255-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Amogre Ayanore, Milena Pavlova, Nuworza Kugbey, Adam Fusheini, John Tetteh, Augustine Adoliba Ayanore, James Akazili, Philip Baba Adongo, Wim Groot |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 220 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
| Researcher | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 103 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 110 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,065,381
of 23,184,056 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#246
of 437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,530
of 457,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,184,056 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.