You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acceptability of Internet-based interventions for problem gambling: a qualitative study of focus groups with clients and clinicians
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-019-1011-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sherald Sanchez, Farah Jindani, Jing Shi, Mark van der Maas, Sylvia Hagopian, Robert Murray, Nigel Turner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2020.
All research outputs
#6,530,596
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#552
of 2,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,758
of 477,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#22
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.