You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Method comparison for the direct enumeration of bacterial species using a chemostat model of the human colon
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Microbiology, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12866-019-1669-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ines B. Moura, Charmaine Normington, Duncan Ewin, Emma Clark, Mark H. Wilcox, Anthony M. Buckley, Caroline H. Chilton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 20% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 13 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 7% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 13 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2020.
All research outputs
#6,833,841
of 25,028,065 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#723
of 3,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,552
of 470,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#10
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,028,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,458 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.