↓ Skip to main content

Method comparison for the direct enumeration of bacterial species using a chemostat model of the human colon

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Method comparison for the direct enumeration of bacterial species using a chemostat model of the human colon
Published in
BMC Microbiology, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12866-019-1669-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ines B. Moura, Charmaine Normington, Duncan Ewin, Emma Clark, Mark H. Wilcox, Anthony M. Buckley, Caroline H. Chilton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 20%
Other 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 13 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 5 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 13 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2020.
All research outputs
#6,833,841
of 25,028,065 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#723
of 3,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,552
of 470,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#10
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,028,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,458 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.