You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protocol: a method to study the direct reprogramming of lateral root primordia to fertile shoots
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-016-0127-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abdul Kareem, Dhanya Radhakrishnan, Xin Wang, Subhikshaa Bagavathiappan, Zankhana B. Trivedi, Kaoru Sugimoto, Jian Xu, Ari Pekka Mähönen, Kalika Prasad |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 22% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| Finland | 1 | 11% |
| Sweden | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 25% |
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2016.
All research outputs
#5,345,891
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#309
of 1,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,576
of 328,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.