↓ Skip to main content

Epigenetic alterations differ in phenotypically distinct human neuroblastoma cell lines

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epigenetic alterations differ in phenotypically distinct human neuroblastoma cell lines
Published in
BMC Cancer, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-10-286
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qiwei Yang, Yufeng Tian, Kelly R Ostler, Alexandre Chlenski, Lisa J Guerrero, Helen R Salwen, Lucy A Godley, Susan L Cohn

Abstract

Epigenetic aberrations and a CpG island methylator phenotype have been shown to be associated with poor outcomes in children with neuroblastoma (NB). Seven cancer related genes (THBS-1, CASP8, HIN-1, TIG-1, BLU, SPARC, and HIC-1) that have been shown to have epigenetic changes in adult cancers and play important roles in the regulation of angiogenesis, tumor growth, and apoptosis were analyzed to investigate the role epigenetic alterations play in determining NB phenotype.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 38 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 14%
Student > Master 6 14%
Other 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 14%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2010.
All research outputs
#4,645,400
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,198
of 8,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,571
of 95,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#11
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,243 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.