↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of tissue injury in lupus nephritis

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanisms of tissue injury in lupus nephritis
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/ar3528
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamara K Nowling, Gary S Gilkeson

Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a prototypic autoimmune disease characterized by autoantibody production and immune complex formation/deposition in target organs such as the kidney. Resultant local inflammation then leads to organ damage. Nephritis, a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with lupus, occurs in approximately 50% of lupus patients. In the present review, we provide an overview of the current research and knowledge concerning mechanisms of renal injury in both lupus-prone mouse models and human lupus patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 153 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Student > Master 21 13%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Other 15 9%
Other 43 27%
Unknown 23 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 6%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 29 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2015.
All research outputs
#3,054,527
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#620
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,737
of 248,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#4
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.