You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Unique core genomes of the bacterial family vibrionaceae: insights into niche adaptation and speciation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-13-179 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim Kahlke, Alexander Goesmann, Erik Hjerde, Nils Peder Willassen, Peik Haugen |
| Abstract |
The criteria for defining bacterial species and even the concept of bacterial species itself are under debate, and the discussion is apparently intensifying as more genome sequence data is becoming available. However, it is still unclear how the new advances in genomics should be used most efficiently to address this question. In this study we identify genes that are common to any group of genomes in our dataset, to determine whether genes specific to a particular taxon exist and to investigate their potential role in adaptation of bacteria to their specific niche. These genes were named unique core genes. Additionally, we investigate the existence and importance of unique core genes that are found in isolates of phylogenetically non-coherent groups. These groups of isolates, that share a genetic feature without sharing a closest common ancestor, are termed genophyletic groups. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 31% |
| Researcher | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 63% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2012.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#9,840
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,215
of 176,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#117
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.