You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Unpacking the complexities of de-implementing inappropriate health interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-019-0960-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wynne E. Norton, David A. Chambers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 288 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 70 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 51 | 18% |
| Australia | 28 | 10% |
| Canada | 9 | 3% |
| Ireland | 5 | 2% |
| Spain | 4 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| South Africa | 3 | 1% |
| Curaçao | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 5% |
| Unknown | 98 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 160 | 56% |
| Scientists | 83 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 36 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 152 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 16% |
| Researcher | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 19% |
| Unknown | 41 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 13% |
| Psychology | 8 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 20% |
| Unknown | 47 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 217. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#181,793
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#7
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,304
of 480,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.