You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Paternally biased X inactivation in mouse neonatal brain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2010-11-7-r79 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xu Wang, Paul D Soloway, Andrew G Clark |
| Abstract |
X inactivation in female eutherian mammals has long been considered to occur at random in embryonic and postnatal tissues. Methods for scoring allele-specific differential expression with a high degree of accuracy have recently motivated a quantitative reassessment of the randomness of X inactivation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 30% |
| Researcher | 26 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,612,352
of 25,848,962 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,298
of 4,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,204
of 104,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,962 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.