You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Electrical interferential current stimulation versus electrical acupuncture in management of hemiplegic shoulder pain and disability following ischemic stroke-a randomized clinical trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Physiotherapy, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40945-019-0071-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fariba Eslamian, Mehdi Farhoudi, Fatemeh Jahanjoo, Elyar Sadeghi-Hokmabadi, Parvin Darabi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
Japan | 1 | 11% |
Central African Republic | 1 | 11% |
Canada | 1 | 11% |
Philippines | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 12% |
Unknown | 39 | 52% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 15% |
Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 40 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,348,636
of 25,153,613 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Physiotherapy
#74
of 159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,932
of 470,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Physiotherapy
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,153,613 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.