↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: evidence from a randomized experiment

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: evidence from a randomized experiment
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12889-017-4198-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sander L. van der Linden, Chris E. Clarke, Edward W. Maibach

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Unspecified 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 57%
Unspecified 1 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,604,817
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,047
of 15,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,013
of 309,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#91
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.