↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: evidence from a randomized experiment

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: evidence from a randomized experiment
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12889-017-4198-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sander L. van der Linden, Chris E. Clarke, Edward W. Maibach

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Master 2 29%
Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 71%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Social Sciences 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2020.
All research outputs
#5,281,998
of 16,555,656 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,832
of 11,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,200
of 382,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#691
of 1,234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,555,656 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.