↓ Skip to main content

Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 1,950)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
235 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12874-020-0897-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannah Harrison, Simon J. Griffin, Isla Kuhn, Juliet A. Usher-Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 235 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 210 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 14%
Student > Master 27 13%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 13 6%
Other 46 22%
Unknown 56 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 9%
Computer Science 16 8%
Social Sciences 13 6%
Psychology 12 6%
Other 50 24%
Unknown 65 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2021.
All research outputs
#218,111
of 22,108,781 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#15
of 1,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,511
of 430,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#2
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,108,781 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.